Biostar N68SB-M2S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar N68SB-M2S  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100624
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 00:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 720
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 85
45% 68.3 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 128
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 2.6
6% 6.63 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6
Splatting 3.5
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 10 9.7 7.3 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 84.3
Write 10.3
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 9.5
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68SB-M2S Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar N68SB-M2S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback