Asus VivoBook S14 X430UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook S14 X430UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X430UA
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 21:40
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 521
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1271) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 4
Parallax 8.1
6% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.3
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 141 143 134 149 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 421
Write 406
Mixed 383
SusWrite 163
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 35.2
130% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 298
217% 279 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA425S6BJR6N-UH 6GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 19.3
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S14 X430UA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S14 X430UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback