Acer Aspire 1810TZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 1810TZ  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM11-MS
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 16:11
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U4100
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 18.3
2-Core 36
27% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 31
8-Core 32.9
4% 32 Pts
64-Core 37.1
2% 37.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 029B) 797MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.32 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.35 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.28%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC40C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 39.8
Mixed 11.1
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.21
49% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1810TZ Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 1810TZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback