Lenovo 2447KM5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2447KM5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2447KM5
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime24.6 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 18:12
Run Duration401 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 186
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 493
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2632
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 8.1
5% 8 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 77 73 76 80 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 443
Write 431
Mixed 378
SusWrite 128
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 31.4
102% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 364
269% 356 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2447KM5 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2447KM5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback