Tongfang GK7CP6S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTongfang GK7CP6S  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GK7CP6S
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime23.7 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 16:00
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 188
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 477
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1065) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.1% Good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 80.8
71% 87 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 72.1
66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
1TB PCS 2.5" SSD 1TB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 120 27 0.4 0.1 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 447
Write 331
Mixed 360
SusWrite 51.3
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 23.8
103% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 46
77% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X4GF2133C15S2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.5% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 19.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GK7CP6S Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Tongfang GK7CP6S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback