Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C660D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWBE
Memory	1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 46.3 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 16.8 21% 26.6 Pts	4-Core 16.8 8-Core 16.1 2% 16.5 Pts	64-Core 16.4 1% 16.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 64GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM09B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 124 151 154 107 157 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 210 Write 181 Mixed 155 SusWrite 139 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 7.9 28% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 56.7 DQ Write 43.1 DQ Mixed 23 24% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CF8 M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.13% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 3 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.13% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	33x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	8x
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	7x

SSD
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
470 Series SSD 64GBSamsungBench 34%, 753 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	7x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	4x
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GBUnknownBench 25%, 62 samples	4x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $120

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16