TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 230%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 260%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive531% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220511
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 17:14
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 175
2-Core 349
111% 206 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,317
118% 993 Pts
64-Core 2,397
148% 2,397 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 1454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 5375 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 309
Reflection 329
Parallax 353
252% 330 fps
MRender 377
Gravity 274
Splatting 201
223% 284 fps
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 214%
 Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS200T1XHE-00AFY0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4793 4807 2420 1572 1508 1574 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
531% Outstanding
Read 4,242
Write 4,854
Mixed 3,210
SusWrite 2,779
849% 3,772 MB/s
4K Read 75.2
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 103
388% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1845
DQ Write 1,424
DQ Mixed 1,591
1,202% 1,620 MB/s
Poor: 256% ↑
This bench: 531%
 Great: 608%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 196 200 195 205 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 86.3
Write 120
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 200
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
222% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 82.3%
 Great: 106%
WD Elements 1TB
99GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 34.9
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 38.3
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 19.6%
 Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL32G32C16U4BL.16FB 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 61.6
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 49.7
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 46.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 142%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2 Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples617x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples449x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD  $230Bench 99%, 60,132 samples301x
GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples164x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples162x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples160x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples148x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples94x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples83x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples42x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples37x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback