PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 9100 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 05DN3X |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101021 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 00:57 |
Run Duration | 230 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$89
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 29 38 32 50 52 MB/s
|
20.8%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
905GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 23 24 24 24 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 196x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 90x |
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 30x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $433 |