Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '22 at 06:56
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 131 58% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 186 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB 7,178 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 22 17 15 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.26% Terrible	Read 5.8 Write 17.8 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 19.3 10% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 7.26% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 38GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 1.9 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 95 42% 95 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	58x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16