Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120208
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 06:28
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 430
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 44.4
26% 35.2 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 20.3
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 427 423 422 436 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 409
Mixed 350
SusWrite 426
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 36.3
126% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 296
241% 343 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 137%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 121 123 121 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 121
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback