MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 20:42
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 178
2-Core 354
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,320
118% 998 Pts
64-Core 2,338
145% 2,338 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 108
Parallax 172
84% 128 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 128
Splatting 74.7
78% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1566 511 513 500 509 501 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 1,754
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 683
307% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 80.8
277% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 1,217
908% 1,206 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 242%
Great: 262%
Intenso PCIe 120GB
51GB free
Firmware: E8FM11.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 139 138 140 141 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 799
Write 420
Mixed 554
SusWrite 183
108% 489 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 49.3
170% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 333
272% 384 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 185%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
151GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 43
Write 40.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 51.9
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 54%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
266GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 69 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 30.6
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 68.3
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 44%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
841GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 81.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 81.7
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 BL16G32C16U4RL.16FE CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 BL16G32C16U4RL.16FE 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 80
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 43
156% 54.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 37.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 142%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback