Samsung 740U3M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 740U3M  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP740U3M-K01US
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 19:11
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 156
51% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 248
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C14B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 7
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512G39TNF-N3A0A 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 340 338 309 347 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 367
Write 239
Mixed 323
SusWrite 324
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 15.4
80% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 337
259% 353 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A5143EB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 740U3M Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 740U3M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback