Pcware IPMH61R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPcware IPMH61R2  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH61R2
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 134
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 204
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 116 118 101 127 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 112
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 77%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
58GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.3 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 6.6
12% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.5
84% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH61R2 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware IPMH61R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback