Microelectronics B247

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics B247  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A520M/ac
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210610
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 15:14
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 75.1
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 934
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Asus(1043 05DB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 126
47% 86.6 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 32.6
55% 72.6 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1461
Write 1,604
Mixed 1,284
324% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 66.6
231% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 970
DQ Mixed 920
704% 951 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 118 125 126 130 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 68.4
Write 114
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 125
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.2
139% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 27.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B247 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Microelectronics B247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback