Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 00:17
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 7.6
2-Core 37.5
34% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 286
28% 229 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 11
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 34.9
9% 18.9 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 37.4
25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU120G1 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z310
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 216
Write 41.8
Mixed 61.7
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 1.5
31% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 27.9
DQ Mixed 0.08
7% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 32%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
568GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 141
Write 167
Mixed 147
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.33
133% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback