ECS A780LM-M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A780LM-M2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 11:01
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 97.9
47% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 193
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 31.4
20% 27.3 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 23.8
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 124 94 95 92 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.3% Average
Read 211
Write 190
Mixed 189
SusWrite 101
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 20.5
72% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 137
104% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
255GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 93 95 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 68.3
Write 65.3
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 94.1
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A780LM-M2 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A780LM-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback