Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FAC
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 08:04
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 526
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1DE1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 342 352 355 362 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 586
Mixed 435
SusWrite 369
130% 588 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 43.7
175% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 415
359% 524 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 140%
Great: 153%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
872GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 93.5
Mixed 67
SusWrite 102
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2800, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback