Asrock H470M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H470M-STX  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 23:50
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 749
77% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
ASRock(1849 9BC5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.43 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.9
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1916 1899 1944 1828 1865 818 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 717
Write 2,008
Mixed 1,948
SusWrite 1,712
366% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 89.2
284% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,102
824% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 271%
Great: 400%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
864GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 78
Write 76.5
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 75
47% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
256GB free
Firmware: AV0D2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 120
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
ACASIS 4TB
301GB free
Firmware: 8034
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 211 210 208 213 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 160
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 208
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
439GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 65 63 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 90.9
Write 93.3
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 63.1
99% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 46%
ASMedia ASM1153 2TB
217GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 83 85 83 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 79
Write 84.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 83.6
91% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
551GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 97 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 93.2
Write 94.9
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 96
107% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 22.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H470M-STX Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H470M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback