HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory8.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5504
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 97.9
48% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 184
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 38.1
26% 30.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 27.6
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 136 159 163 179 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.8% Above average
Read 251
Write 224
Mixed 216
SusWrite 156
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 25.8
86% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 146
122% 175 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 102%
OOS1000G 1TB
621GB free
Firmware: BE53
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 100 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 99.5
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 98.5
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 110%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
660GB free
Firmware: 14244514
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 92 93 99 99 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 75.3
Write 63.1
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 93.4
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST500VM000-1SD101 500GB
200GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 110 117 120 122 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 114
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 100%
Generic Ultra HS-COMBO 64GB
51GB free, PID 2240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 17 11 12 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 14.2
24% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.8
183% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:85 F7 F6451U67F9333G 46GB
1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback