Lenovo 90G8004AMB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive443% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90G8004AMB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36C5
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 22:42
Run Duration991 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 660
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
MSI(1462 3511) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.6% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 26
Parallax 29.1
21% 27.1 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 21.2
22% 28.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 50 49 51 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
443% Outstanding
Read 5,662
Write 54.9
Mixed 110
SusWrite 49.9
306% 1,469 MB/s
4K Read 525
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 6.9
806% 178 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 443%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 202 205 204 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 154
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 203
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
37GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 49 52 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 53.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 51.2
67% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 63%
ADATA HV300 5TB
2TB free, PID a82a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 34.6
Write 36.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 40.3
45% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 57%
ADATA HD710 PRO 4TB
2TB free, PID a75a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 31 33 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 33.4
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 32.6
44% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90G8004AMB Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90G8004AMB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback