Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160623
Uptime4 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 22:26
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 32
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 16.8
16% 21.1 Pts
4-Core 50.6
8-Core 19.4
5% 35 Pts
64-Core 53.5
3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 2.6
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SMS151S3128GG 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 55 74 80 83 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 331
Write 96.9
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 74.5
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 11.4
56% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 7.7
28% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback