Huananzhi Gaming TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHuananzhi Gaming TF  (all builds)
MotherboardHuananzhi X99-TF Gaming
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 17:51
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 753
67% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 89.8
54% 73.7 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 48.8
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 459 341 302 300 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 443
Mixed 437
SusWrite 362
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 51.7
169% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 45.6
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 20
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 122%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gaming TF Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Gaming TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback