Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V5C-S0CTR
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 16:33
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 67.9
45% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 65.6
8-Core 66.8
9% 66.2 Pts
64-Core 68
4% 68 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 2
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 150 66 76 57 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 419
Write 257
Mixed 289
SusWrite 118
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 25.5
108% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 122
91% 120 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 17341 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 0.4
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback