ECS GeForce6100PM-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	ECS GeForce6100PM-M2 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091009
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 72 1-Core 14.3 2-Core 76.3 36% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 26.7 8-Core 86.7 6% 56.7 Pts	64-Core 49.2 3% 49.2 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Elitegroup(1019 2602) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.08 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 755GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 22 31 29 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 54 Write 79.6 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 24.4 32% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 109%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZBX-75A 2TB 962 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 0.7 Write 1 SusWrite 0.1 0% 0.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 135%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB 2,661 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 938GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 12 18 14 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 68.2 Write 6.6 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 20.1 26% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 450GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.9 2.2 3 2.7 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 62 Write 40.2 Mixed 36 SusWrite 2.7 42% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston " JM800QLU-2G 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 333, 333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 1.3 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GeForce6100PM-M2 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS GeForce6100PM-M2

CPU
Phenom 9350e Quad-CoreAMDBench 43%, 168 samples	4x
Sempron 140AMD $9Bench 35%, 2,532 samples	2x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	12x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $102

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48