HP p6-2260ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP p6-2260ea  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120607
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 149
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 207
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2ADA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 60 52 51 34 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 234
Write 212
Mixed 191
SusWrite 65.2
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 11.8
51% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 77.9
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 32
39% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ABA100 1TB
597GB free
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 119 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 104
Write 99.4
Mixed 29
SusWrite 117
63% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2260ea Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2260ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback