HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '17 at 11:48
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344 2,187 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 517 51% 419 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M 4,288 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 176B) 2GB CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	6.1% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 7.69 6% 6.84 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 8.27 Splatting 9.17 7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 MSATA 256GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3542012 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 6451 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 264 (B4) Unknown 100 100 16133 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2564134601301 (F1) Unknown 253 253 13859207765 (F2) Unknown 253 253 12537786540	59.8% Above average	Read 256 Write 252 Mixed 254 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 24.9 84% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 65.4 81% 142 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 90%
Toshiba HG6 128GB 5,641 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 76GB free Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3911 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1215 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 191 191 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 196 (C2) HDA temperature 71 52 206160068637 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	93.4% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 477 Mixed 502 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 35.8 97% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 151 149% 237 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 104%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 558GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 118 118 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 29 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 29 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 942 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 188980199453 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	51.7% Above average	Read 85.6 Write 94.6 Mixed 88 67% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.2 78% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.1% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.5 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	197x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	493x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16