Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

21 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 375 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 30.3 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 72.4 26% 46 Pts	4-Core 88.1 8-Core 101 12% 94.4 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E63 002E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 4.3 1% 2.5 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shiji 128GB 128GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0126A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 48 57 9.9 35 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.1% Poor	Read 118 Write 122 Mixed 191 SusWrite 50.9 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 8.4 50% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 71.4 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 26 48% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 253 16% 253 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 26%, 375 samples	8x
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	6x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	8x
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16