HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory9.4 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 08:45
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 88
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 432
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 725 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.52 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 0.61
1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB3i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 212
Write 148
Mixed 204
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 11.5
60% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 7.58
14% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 37%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
466GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 123
Mixed 124
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.38
89% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
232GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 132
Mixed 123
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.37
88% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6K1 ID:80 AD HMT325U7CFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6K1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback