TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 07:46
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom X3 8650
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 70.3
34% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 104
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 35.4%
 Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 405
Device(107D 5AF9) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 0.95%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BW180A3L 180GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 89 100 58 82 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 107
Write 99.7
Mixed 109
SusWrite 87.2
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 26.7
91% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 36.7
31% 45 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 40.2%
 Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
120GB free
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 179 162 155 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 168
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 170
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Gb0750c4 414 750GB
198GB free
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.8 9.6 9.1 8.7 9.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 46.2
Write 8.4
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 9.2
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 15.9%
 Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 19.2%
 Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples18x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD  $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples17x
Athlon II X4 640AMD  $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples17x
GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples20x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples9x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples9x
SSD
0 120GBCt120bx5Bench 50%, 558 samples7x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples6x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples4x
RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples96x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples52x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback