Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory52 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 04:02
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 175
2-Core 347
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,264
113% 955 Pts
64-Core 2,232
138% 2,232 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 299
Parallax 261
116% 234 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
117% 143 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 113%
Great: 225%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1214 1187 1281 1379 1425 1453 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 1,519
Mixed 1,579
SusWrite 1,323
388% 1,743 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 90.8
302% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,435
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,286
965% 1,292 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 334%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C17 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 54.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 41
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 35.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 121%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback