Dell Precision 5520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemDell Precision 5520  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R6JFH
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220323
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 22:36
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 39.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
61% 116 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 110
36% 226 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
Dell(1028 07BF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.9
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.3
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DC4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 631 708 478 631 725 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 662
Write 578
Mixed 545
SusWrite 635
136% 605 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 17.7
51% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 150
111% 148 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K821PJ-MID 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 20.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 1 60 15.6" 1280 720 SHP1453
Typical Precision 5520 Builds (Compare 2,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 5520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback