HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80CC
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 15:23
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 75
36% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 135
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 80CC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
459GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 358 371 235 231 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 250
Write 340
Mixed 294
SusWrite 296
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 28.6
97% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 166
122% 160 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1L16BC2N1-BQHS Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback