Positivo MOBILE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemPositivo MOBILE  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO M14
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 36
2-Core 67.7
38% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 70.3
8-Core 69.7
9% 70 Pts
64-Core 70.5
4% 70.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1297 2000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 67 70 58 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 40
SusWrite 65.7
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1B0873EV AD73I1B0873EV 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MOBILE Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo MOBILE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback