Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II N950 264 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 90.4 1-Core 31.6 2-Core 54.6 44% 58.9 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 125 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M 12,937 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 036E) 1GB Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.783.2.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507K SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 178 167 172 151 144 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.2% Poor	Read 192 Write 190 Mixed 187 SusWrite 166 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 6.2 20% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 94%
SD Card 32GB 861 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.08% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 7.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 10.2 12% 9.75 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST102464BC1339.16F 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Phenom II N970 Quad-CoreAMDBench 41%, 548 samples	1x
Phenom II N930AMDBench 40%, 536 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	1x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	1x
99U5428-041.A01LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 32%, 39 samples	1x