Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '17 at 23:19
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 59
2-Core 118
57% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 344
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 121
Parallax 104
93% 113 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 105
Splatting 108
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 186
Write 88.7
Mixed 106
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 8.74
42% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 7.43
10% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST6000DM0003 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: DNA2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 139
Mixed 137
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.26
78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
59GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 76.5
Write 101
Mixed 76.7
64% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.43
119% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 14.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $778
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback