Default N7-B65XT

Performance Results

Gaming 113%
Desktop 106%
Workstation 106%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault N7-B65XT  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock N7-B65XT
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 77.7
1-Core 195
2-Core 391
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,076
110% 889 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 104%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 134
Parallax 235
96% 162 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 115
Splatting 147
128% 159 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 450 453 464 465 465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 462
Mixed 408
SusWrite 451
97% 427 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.8
201% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 148
170% 290 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
69GB free
Firmware: S7780101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,430
Write 1,280
Mixed 1,200
290% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 88.9
314% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 577
567% 915 MB/s
Poor: 163% Great: 334%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 9
Mixed 13
SusWrite 13.8
16% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5600U3636C16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 51.8
MC Mixed 45.2
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 41.9
SC Write 51.7
SC Mixed 43.6
131% 45.7 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 137%
Great: 195%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback