Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 11:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 362
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 705
Sapphire(174B 214A) 1GB
CLim: 873 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M7VG 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 30 32 36 32 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
812GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 187 189 193 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 189
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 190
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 8GB
0GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.9
Write 9
Mixed 9
18% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.3
131% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4U7S1MB-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback