Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5V-A0CAE
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 10:10
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 28
2-Core 54.6
34% 49.3 Pts
4-Core 50.9
8-Core 52.9
7% 51.9 Pts
64-Core 54.2
3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.9
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 167 305 292 308 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 421
Write 365
Mixed 367
SusWrite 279
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 24.3
76% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 86.9
66% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5173CB0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback