Medion E6415 MD99974

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E6415 MD99974  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D15DUN
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 07:52
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 97.9
42% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 136
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2244) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 5.2
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2.5" PHISON 128GB PS3110-S10C
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 392
Mixed 340
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 26.4
93% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 52.1
104% 210 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
826GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 95 97 73 93 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 85.2
Write 86.1
Mixed 34
SusWrite 87.1
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E6415 MD99974 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Medion E6415 MD99974

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback