Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 161% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 138% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 20:30
Run Duration	80 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Memory 97.9 1-Core 166 2-Core 332 108% 199 Pts	4-Core 653 8-Core 926 99% 790 Pts	64-Core 916 57% 916 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 224 Parallax 226 172% 220 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 213 Splatting 150 137% 168 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 140%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ VX500 256GB-$128 190 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: JYCX0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1052 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 182 182 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 647 (C2) HDA temperature 70 63 158915166238 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	94% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 485 Mixed 505 112% 503 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 24.9 136% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 24.7 34% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	MC Read 40.4 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 34.3 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 43.5 SC Mixed 34.1 93% 32.7 GB/s	Latency 46.6 86% 46.6 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,006x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	254x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	198x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	60x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	42x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16