| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus F1A75-V PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 28 '22 at 17:09 |
| Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 81% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27%
Poor
|
30% 47.9 Pts
|
10% 82 Pts
|
5% 82.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
6.39%
Terrible
|
6% 8.2 fps
|
7% 9.07 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 60 51 55 46 50 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
42% 187 MB/s
|
37% 13.6 MB/s
|
29% 45.9 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 6.5 6.8 7.2 7.2 MB/s
|
7.71%
Terrible
|
19% 14.8 MB/s
|
59% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer 78.B1GEP.CP00C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
14% 4.83 GB/s
|
21% 191 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 16x |
| A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 6x |
| A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 9x |
| Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $213 |