Casper HALLEY-ALFA-OMEGA-ERA SERIES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemCasper HALLEY-ALFA-OMEGA-ERA SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER SLP 1.0-2.0
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 11:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6400
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 52.9
30% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 51.3
8-Core 51.9
7% 51.6 Pts
64-Core 51.6
3% 51.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
PwrHis(1787 2266) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 8.3
9% 10.5 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 8
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.32%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 59 60 63 67 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 46.8
Write 57.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 60.5
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HALLEY-ALFA-OMEGA-ERA SERIES Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Casper HALLEY-ALFA-OMEGA-ERA SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback