TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Daktech Gemini 67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDaktech Gemini 67  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 06:49
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 155
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 299
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 67.6%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2008) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 0.84%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 74 111 102 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 117
Write 122
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 99.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 62.1%
 Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
461GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 68
SusWrite 132
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 71.3%
 Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
461GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 124 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 102
Write 110
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 124
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 64.7%
 Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 49.7%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Gemini 67 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Daktech Gemini 67

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel  $137Bench 67%, 185,630 samples3x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples2x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples1x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples3x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples1x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples1x
SSD
SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 73%, 475 samples1x
BX100 250GBCrucial  $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples1x
RAM
CT51264BA1339J.M8F Kingston 9965413-002.A00LF Kingston 9965413-002.A00LF CT51264BA1339J.M8F 16GBUnknownBench 46%, 4 samples2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples2x
99U5471-028.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 769 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback