Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 22:00
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 50.1
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 151
51% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 286
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 388 364 384 596 867 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,262
Write 1,165
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 525
233% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 626
469% 631 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 140%
Great: 284%
NT-2TB 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN3060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 162 151 160 220 295 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 384
Write 330
Mixed 272
SusWrite 186
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 23.7
77% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 182
140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 15.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback