Digibras NM70-I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDigibras NM70-I  (all builds)
MotherboardDigiboard NM70-I
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 20:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 28.6
2-Core 56.4
36% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 55.8
8-Core 57.4
8% 56.6 Pts
64-Core 56.5
4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.9
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN06201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 82 85 85 90 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 333
Write 87.3
Mixed 124
SusWrite 86.1
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 15.9
74% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 87.2
70% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NM70-I Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Digibras NM70-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback