MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 142
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 687
71% 572 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 80.7
47% 66.7 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 44.8
46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,724
Write 87.2
Mixed 764
185% 859 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 51.2
173% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 721
527% 698 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
37GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,264
Write 906
Mixed 978
233% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 54.8
185% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 785
595% 805 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
52GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 121 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 156
Write 90
Mixed 77
SusWrite 123
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 114%
WDC WD20 PURX-64P6ZY0 2TB
113GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 100 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 84.6
Write 84
Mixed 54
SusWrite 99.5
110% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
348GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 3.2 5.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 95.9
Write 89.7
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 3.6
58% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 100 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 99.2
125% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 30.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 24.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $631
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback