ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro SYS-4029GP-TRT2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro SYS-4029GP-TRT2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X11DPG-OT-CPU
Memory	373.6 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , , , ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R 69 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 208 69% 124 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 854 77% 648 Pts	64-Core 4170 258% 4170 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 107GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 124 74 99 86 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 433 Write 182 Mixed 374 SusWrite 97.4 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 11.9 41% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 76 DQ Write 89.3 DQ Mixed 89.8 66% 85 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 52%
Intel SSDPE2KX020T8 2TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 260% 2TB free Firmware: VDV10131 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1805 1836 1825 1809 1817 1815 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 970 Write 1,743 Mixed 1,115 SusWrite 1,818 322% 1,412 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 291 4K Mixed 46.7 254% 121 MB/s	DQ Read 1,460 DQ Write 1,100 DQ Mixed 1,216 927% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 205% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 299%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40DB2-CVF 12x31.9GB 12 of 24 slots used 383GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	158% Outstanding	MC Read 60.9 MC Write 78.3 MC Mixed 62 192% 67.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback