Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_KM513UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_KM513UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513UA
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 16:13
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 51.7
1-Core 87
2-Core 167
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 734
65% 551 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 17C2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 28.3
7% 18.2 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 21.5
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 249 217 216 219 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,200
Write 903
Mixed 904
SusWrite 226
180% 808 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 58.7
205% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 254
252% 414 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 147%
Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 108 108 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 73
Write 100
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 106
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 BL.9BWWA.204 12GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 25.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_KM513UA Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_KM513UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback