MSI MS-17F3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Creator 17M A9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-17F3  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 511
60% 462 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 1087 1065 1085 1002 1018 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,672
Write 1,036
Mixed 714
SusWrite 1,065
250% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 47
164% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 850
647% 880 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 222%
Great: 329%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
835GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 401 409 399 389 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 406
Mixed 370
SusWrite 394
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 42
144% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 235
205% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F3 Builds (Compare 1,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback