Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 10:39
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 145
2-Core 281
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 938
90% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,473
91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1E21) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.09
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 103
Parallax 27.6
15% 49.6 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 18.2
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 58 56 56 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 1,184
Write 823
Mixed 637
SusWrite 102
152% 687 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
4% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 209%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2597 2647 2578 2388 2621 2622 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
418% Outstanding
Read 2,556
Write 2,644
Mixed 2,428
SusWrite 2,576
576% 2,551 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 103
340% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,296
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1162
876% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 418%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP016GBSFU266F01 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback